Recently an ASU student wrote a letter to the editor concerning the accountability of the Appalachian State Student Government Association. You can view this letter here. We value the opinions and concerns of all students, and hope that they will continue to have their voices heard. This was one of our main goals on the campaign trail, and we are pleased to see that students are motivated to speak up about what they see at this university.
Jonathan Meisner wrote the following letter in response, in hopes to better explain the Tuition and Fees process, as well as clear up some incorrect figures given by the concerned student.
Dear Editor,
I am writing this week in response to Tuesday’s letter to the editor. Tuesday’s letter expressed two points of concern. The first was that this year’s recommended tuition increase from the University Tuition Committee was higher than last years. The second concern was that SGA was not following a piece of legislation written last year that set a timeline for the processes of the Tuition and Fee Committees.
To address the first concern, the Tuition Committee has recommended a 4.2% tuition increase. Last year the Tuition Committee proposed an increase of 5.2%, not 3.4% as stated by the author of the letter to the editor. You can read more about last year’s proposed increase by viewing the article in The Appalachian here.
I would also like to state that recommendations from the Tuition and Fee Committees are merely recommendations to the Chancellor. These recommendations may or may not be changed by Chancellor Peacock, and he then makes his recommendations to the Board of Trustees who in turn recommends their proposal to the Board of Governors. The committee’s proposal may or may not be what actually happens with tuition for the following year.
There are reasons for having tuition increases. I don’t think that it is news to anyone that there is currently a budget crisis within our state, meaning that our universities are receiving less money from the state. The only way to ensure that we have the means to ensure a quality education is to have a tuition increase. There is a 6.5% cap on tuition and I am pleased that our proposal does not “max out.”
The items that the tuition increase will be going towards are essential and important to students at Appalachian. Some of them include financial aid, faculty positions, and advisors, just to name a few. The items that the author expressed concern about were Learning Assistance Program (LAP) Advisors and Library Positions.
The LAP advisors currently exist, and need to continue to exist, to ensure that students have the help and guidance they need to graduate on time, which in turn will save students money. State funding was cut for these positions, and fees that go to Athletics had to be used to maintain these spots. The committee voted to move the positions back to state funding where it was originally. This was done in the form of a tuition increase.
If you think about it, if you do not return the positions to where they make the most sense (paid by tuition), then the Athletic fee will have to increase even more to offset the new cost. Students need those positions and they will have to be paid for by either tuition or fees.
Regarding the library positions, the committee voted to include only one of the three proposed library positions in their final recommendation. This library position is the Web Librarian who is responsible for maintaining the Library’s website and ensuring that students are easily able to navigate the website to find resources necessary to learning. There used to be a person in this position but the position became vacant, and when the budget cuts hit, no one on campus was allowed to fill empty positions. If this position remains empty, the web resources offered to students will be hurt.
The second concern was that SGA was not following a piece of legislation that set a timeline for the processes of the Tuition and Fee Committees. Appointments to these committees were made on time according to the legislation. The Fee Committee met in accordance with the legislation on Wednesday of the third full week in September. The Tuition Committee met in early October, which is about two weeks later than the legislation called for.
Reasoning for meeting later than the legislation stipulated was that UNC-System schools were awaiting direction for the tuition and fee processes from the Board of Governors. The state budget for the 2010-2011 year stipulates a $200 or 8% tuition increase (whichever is cheaper). This is something that a lot of students, administrators, and public officials are lobbying to remove from next year’s budget, as the universities will not receive any benefit from this “tax on students.”
This tuition increase caused universities to believe that they would not be allowed to have any campus-based tuition increases. Additionally, in late September of this year, when the legislation stated the Tuition Committee should convene, there were no requests from any departments for a tuition increase.
It is quite a task getting together a room full of busy administrators, faculty members, and students that all make up the Tuition Committee. Scheduling a meeting to talk about campus based tuition increases when none have yet been referred to the committee is simply inefficient. The entire reason and purpose for the legislation was to have enough time to communicate with students and get proper feedback that is necessary to be true representatives on these committees.
This year, the Fee Committee met a total of 6 times over 6 weeks and the Tuition Committee met 4 times over 5 weeks. In between each meeting I reported to Senate, wrote blog updates, gave information to the school paper and radio station, and this week hosted an open Tuition and Fee Forum where we had over 75 students attend, ask questions, and even fill out a survey voicing their thoughts on tuition and fees. We have had plenty of great feedback from students and there would not be any benefit of starting the Tuition Committee a week or two earlier.
I hope that this letter has been easy to understand and informative. If anyone has any questions or concerns about tuition and fees or anything else, I encourage you to send me an e-mail or stop by the SGA offices on the second floor of the Student Union.
Respectfully,
Jonathan Meisner
Student Body President
Appalachian State University